|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
Section 404 - other planning considerations Period-End Reporting Process The period-end financial reporting process is ALWAYS a significant process because of its importance to financial reporting. Understanding how this process relates to the company’s other significant processes will assist management (and the external auditor) in identifying and testing controls that are most relevant to the company’s financial statement risks. The period-end financial reporting process includes the following:
Management should evaluate the following items:
Due to the periodic nature of financial statement preparation, especially year-end financial information, the company should not wait until the end of their fiscal year to test these controls. If controls over the financial reporting process (including footnote disclosure) are found to be deficient, the deficiency will likely be classified as a material weakness.
Accounting Estimates, Judgments and Assumptions In preparing financial information, management is often required to use estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and recognition of revenue and expenses. These items are often significant to the financial statements. Examples of estimates and judgments include:
The methodology supporting such estimates, judgments and assumptions must be defined, documented and periodically reviewed by the company.
Effect of Mergers and Acquisitions Newly acquired entities may be initially excluded from the assessment of internal control over financial reporting, where it is not possible to conduct an assessment between the purchase date and the date of management’s report. This period cannot extend beyond one year from the acquisition date and the exclusion must be disclosed in management’s and the auditor’s report. New acquisitions bring new risks and integration issues to the company. Management should develop a plan to incorporate newly acquired entities into the company’s system of internal control over financial reporting as soon as possible after their acquisition date. Many companies are evaluating internal controls as part of their due diligence on potential acquisition candidates. Use of Work of Others by Management and External Auditors In an effort to reduce costs, the company may seek to rely on some of the work performed by third parties and external auditors. The use of the work of third parties by management is covered in Update #5. The company may not use the work of the external auditor in conducting their assessment of internal control over financial reporting. However, external auditors, under certain circumstances may use selected work of management in the auditor’s assessment. Auditors are required to understand the results of testing by management, and others under the direction of management, and evaluate whether or not to use the results. Auditors are prohibited from relying on the work in certain areas, including (but not necessarily limited to), performing tests of controls in the control environment and performing walkthroughs for each major class of transactions. These areas are deemed to be too important to the auditor in obtaining an understanding of the system of internal control. When the auditor intends to rely on/use the work performed by management (or others under their direction), they must test the work performed by management including (1) re-performing some of the tests made by management and (2) testing similar controls. The nature of the tests depends on the effect of work by others, but should be sufficient for the auditor to make a determination about the overall quality, competence and objectivity of the individuals performing the original test. Factors to evaluate in the individuals performing the original test include:
Updates are designed to provide highly summarized information regarding general Sarbanes-Oxley and PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 2 information and are not intended to be a substitute for any official publication. Please refer to the original source documents and other authoritative guidance provided by the SEC, PCAOB and others for more detailed information on these subjects.
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 Update #7 Documentation of the design of controls provides some supporting evidence that the controls have been identified, communicated and are capable of being monitored by the company. Documentation also provides a foundation for communication concerning responsibilities for performing, evaluating and monitoring controls as required under the audit of internal control.
Management Documentation At a minimum, management must document the following items:
The form of documentation is not specified in PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 2 and may take several forms. Form and content will vary, based on the size, nature and complexity of the company. Inadequate documentation of the design of controls over relevant assertions related to significant accounts and disclosures is a deficiency, which would likely be considered a significant deficiency or material weakness in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Inadequate documentation could also cause the auditor to conclude that there is a limitation on the scope of the engagement.
Walkthroughs During the documentation process, management should perform walk-throughs of each major class of transactions. This process involves following a transaction from origination through the company’s information systems to its presentation in the financial reports. This provides evidence regarding:
Walkthroughs should encompass the entire process for an individual transaction and related controls. This includes the areas of:
Where important processing procedures or controls occur, inquiries should be made of individuals performing duties with regard to their understanding of what is required by the process/control and if the control is being performed timely and as originally understood. Updates are designed to provide highly summarized information regarding general Sarbanes-Oxley and PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 2 information and are not intended to be a substitute for any official document. Please refer to the original source documents and other authoritative guidance provided by the SEC, PCAOB and others for more detailed information on these subjects. |
||
|